OPTIMIZING CURRICULUM ADMINISTRATION AND LEARNING EVALUATION IN SCHOOLS THROUGH PROBLEM-BASED TRAINING FOR TEACHERS AT SMAN 2 SIAK HULU

Authors

  • sri agustina ratnawati Universitas Riau Author
  • ria rafianti Universitas Riau Author
  • rizki ananda hasibuan Universitas Riau Author
  • nofriza efendi Universitas Riau Author
  • nadia ramona Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sumbar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/2kgajb64

Keywords:

Learning Evaluation, Curriculum Management, Participatory Action Research, Problem-Based Training, Teacher Professionalism

Abstract

Curriculum policy transitions demand teacher adaptation in managing learning resources and implementing comprehensive evaluations. However, preliminary observations at SMAN 2 Siak Hulu reveal that [specify percentage, e.g., 70%] of teachers still experience disorientation in designing authentic assessment instruments and aligning learning modules with student needs. This community service activity aims to reconstruct teachers' understanding and skills in curriculum management and learning evaluation through a Problem-Based Training (PBT) approach. The program was implemented using a Participatory Action Research (PAR) method integrated into three cyclical stages: (1) identification of pedagogical problems, (2) problem-solving workshops and instrument development, and (3) mentoring and peer-review evaluation. This activity involved [specify number, e.g., 45] teachers across various subjects. Program effectiveness was measured using pre-test and post-test instruments, as well as portfolio analysis of learning products. The results showed a significant increase in participants' pedagogical understanding by [e.g., 82%], as evidenced by the teachers' successful creation of [e.g., 45 validated teaching modules and formative-summative evaluation rubrics]. Furthermore, the PBT approach proved effective in collaboratively eliminating administrative constraints while shifting teachers' paradigms from a clerical orientation toward reflective habits for continuous learning quality improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hamalik, O. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Magdalena, I. (2023). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar. CV Jejak (Jejak Publisher).

Ratnawati, S. A., Rafianti, R., Barkara, R. S., & Syahputra, M. A. D. (2024). Hubungan Konflik Terhadap Profesionalitas Kerja Guru Upt Smpn 10 Tapung Kabupaten Kampar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kearifan Lokal, 4(6), 1009-1018.

Sanjaya, W. (2010). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktik Pengembangan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.

Satrio, S., Hasibuan, L., Us, K. A., & Rizki, A. F. (2021). Administrasi Kurikulum, Kesiswaan, Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan dalam Tinjauan Administasi Sekolah. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 4(2), 92-101.

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sukmadinata, N.S. (2009). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suryosubroto, B. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Turnip, H., Sihombing, S., Gaol, S. L., & Limbong, Y. T. (2023). Administrasi kurikulum. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 116-123.

Yandrizal, Y., Rifma, R., Syahril, S., Barkara, R. S., & Novebri, N. (2021). Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(2), 71-75

Downloads

Published

10-10-2026

How to Cite

OPTIMIZING CURRICULUM ADMINISTRATION AND LEARNING EVALUATION IN SCHOOLS THROUGH PROBLEM-BASED TRAINING FOR TEACHERS AT SMAN 2 SIAK HULU. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Education, 2(2), 283-287. https://doi.org/10.23960/2kgajb64

Similar Articles

31-39 of 39

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.