Peer Review Process
Research articles submitted to this online journal will be reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers. After the peer review process, accepted articles will be published and made available online. This journal accepts articles written in English or Indonesian.
The peer review process is intended to evaluate the validity, quality, and originality of articles before publication. Its primary goal is to maintain scientific integrity by filtering out invalid or low-quality work. From a publisher's perspective, peer review acts as a content filter, guiding high-quality articles into reputable journals and helping to build the journal’s academic reputation.
Through this process, each article is enhanced and gains more scholarly value. Therefore, it is essential for the publisher to ensure that peer reviews are conducted properly. An effective peer review can significantly improve the quality of published articles by encouraging authors to submit high-quality work and providing constructive feedback for improvement.
Every submitted article will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
-
Originality of the contribution to the scholarly field, accuracy of the theory and methodology, consistency of analysis, clarity of communication (grammar and style), and adherence to the journal’s submission format and guidelines.
-
The typical review and evaluation timeline is 1 to 2 months from the date of submission. Manuscripts received by the editor will be forwarded to the appropriate section editor within approximately one day.
-
The section editor will analyze the manuscript within 10 days.
-
Afterward, the section editor will assign the manuscript to two reviewers with an expected review period of one month. The review results will be communicated to the author within one day after the reviewers' comments have been consolidated.
